Product Guides
Hearing Protection Guide: Earplugs vs Earmuffs & NRR Ratings
Noise-induced hearing loss is permanent, painless as it develops, and entirely preventable. It is also one of the most common occupational injuries in Australia. Safe Work Australia estimates around 28-37% of hearing loss in the working-age population is attributable to workplace noise, and once the hair cells in your cochlea are damaged, they do not regenerate. No surgery, no hearing aid fully restores what noise takes away. The problem is not simply the existence of loud environments. It is that most people in those environments are wearing hearing protection incorrectly, wearing the wrong class for the noise level, or making small fitting errors that eliminate the majority of the product's rated protection. A Class 5 earplug worn loosely may deliver less actual attenuation than a correctly fitted Class 3. This guide covers everything you need to select, fit, and rely on hearing protection in an Australian industrial, construction, or trade environment: the AS/NZS 1270 standard and what SLC80 classes actually mean, the difference between earplugs and earmuffs, how electronic earmuffs work, when to use double protection, and the most common fitting mistakes that negate the product you paid for. This guide is part of AIMS Industrial's curated Engineering Reference Charts library — 78 reference articles across fasteners, threading, bearings, lubrication and safety standards. AS/NZS 1270 Hearing Classes — Quick Reference Hearing protection sold for occupational use in Australia and New Zealand must comply with AS/NZS 1270:2002, Acoustics — Hearing protectors. This is the standard that governs how hearing protectors are tested, classified, and labelled. It is maintained jointly by Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand. The rating system specified in AS/NZS 1270 uses a metric called SLC80: Sound Level Conversion at the 80th percentile. This tells you the amount of noise reduction (in decibels) that can be expected for 80% of wearers when the product is fitted correctly. Expressing it at the 80th percentile accounts for real-world variability in fit between different users — it is a statistically conservative estimate designed to reflect performance in practice, not under ideal laboratory conditions. The SLC80 value is then used to assign the product to one of five classes: Class SLC80 Range Noise Level (dB(A) at ear, without PPE) Typical Use Class 1 10–13 dB Up to 90 dB(A) Light industrial, machinery rooms, low-level continuous noise Class 2 14–17 dB Up to 95 dB(A) General manufacturing, moderate mechanical noise Class 3 18–21 dB Up to 100 dB(A) Heavy manufacturing, construction, compressors, generators Class 4 22–25 dB Up to 105 dB(A) Angle grinders, jackhammers, loud power tools Class 5 26+ dB Up to 110 dB(A) Extremely loud environments: airports, mining, explosive use Why Hearing Protection Matters: Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Australia The WHS Regulations set the exposure standard at an eight-hour equivalent continuous sound level (LAeq,8h) of 85 dB(A) and a peak sound pressure level of 140 dB(C). These are not guidelines — they are legal limits. Above these thresholds, employers must implement a hierarchy of controls: eliminate the noise source, substitute quieter equipment, engineer the noise out, isolate workers, and only then reach for personal protective equipment including hearing protection. In practice, elimination and engineering are often not possible or not sufficient, which means hearing protection is a primary control in many industrial trades. The legal trigger for mandatory hearing protection is noise exposure at or above 85 dB(A) LAeq,8h. In practical terms, if you need to raise your voice to be heard by someone one metre away, the background noise is probably at or above 85 dB(A). Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) develops gradually and without pain. Workers typically do not notice meaningful loss until 25-40 dB of high-frequency hearing has been destroyed, often across the 3,000–6,000 Hz range first. The result is difficulty distinguishing speech, trouble hearing in noisy environments, and progressive isolation. Tinnitus (ringing in the ears) frequently accompanies NIHL and can itself be debilitating. The occupational groups with the highest documented noise exposure in Australia include construction trades, manufacturing, mining, agriculture, aviation ground crew, live entertainment crew, and defence personnel. However, noise at injurious levels is also common in workshops, on loading docks, and during tasks as routine as grinding, cutting, drilling, or operating pneumatic tools. The key point for anyone selecting hearing protection: the protection only works if it is the right class for the noise level and fitted correctly every single time. Inconsistent use — removing protection for just a few minutes in a high-noise environment — dramatically erodes the effective protection over a full shift. Australian Standard AS/NZS 1270 and SLC80 Explained Hearing protection sold for occupational use in Australia and New Zealand must comply with AS/NZS 1270:2002, Acoustics — Hearing protectors. This is the standard that governs how hearing protectors are tested, classified, and labelled. It is maintained jointly by Standards Australia and Standards New Zealand. The rating system specified in AS/NZS 1270 uses a metric called SLC80: Sound Level Conversion at the 80th percentile. This tells you the amount of noise reduction (in decibels) that can be expected for 80% of wearers when the product is fitted correctly. Expressing it at the 80th percentile accounts for real-world variability in fit between different users — it is a statistically conservative estimate designed to reflect performance in practice, not under ideal laboratory conditions. The SLC80 value is then used to assign the product to one of five classes: Class SLC80 Range Noise Level (dB(A) at ear, without PPE) Typical Use Class 1 10–13 dB Up to 90 dB(A) Light industrial, machinery rooms, low-level continuous noise Class 2 14–17 dB Up to 95 dB(A) General manufacturing, moderate mechanical noise Class 3 18–21 dB Up to 100 dB(A) Heavy manufacturing, construction, compressors, generators Class 4 22–25 dB Up to 105 dB(A) Angle grinders, jackhammers, loud power tools Class 5 26+ dB Up to 110 dB(A) Extremely loud environments: airports, mining, explosive use The class is printed on the product packaging and often moulded or stamped on the product itself. When selecting hearing protection, you first need to know the noise level at your work location — measured in dB(A) — and match it to the appropriate class. Under-protecting is a WHS compliance issue and a health risk. Over-protecting creates a different problem covered later in this guide. It is worth being clear about what "fitted correctly" means in the context of the SLC80 rating. The standard assumes the wearer has been trained in correct fit, the product is in good condition, and it is worn continuously throughout the noise exposure period. Remove a Class 5 earplug for 15 minutes in a 110 dB(A) environment and the effective protection for that eight-hour shift drops significantly. How to Calculate the Noise Level at the Ear Knowing the SLC80 value and the environmental noise level, you can calculate the approximate noise level at the ear using the formula specified in AS/NZS 1270. For Class-based selection, Safe Work Australia's simplified approach is: Effective noise level at ear = Environmental noise level (dB(A)) − SLC80 value The target is to reduce the noise level at the ear to between 75 and 80 dB(A). The lower bound matters as much as the upper: going below 70 dB(A) at the ear means you are over-protecting, which creates communication and situational awareness risks. The practical target range for most industrial environments is 75–80 dB(A) at the ear after protection is applied. Example: If the environmental noise level is 100 dB(A) and you select a Class 3 product with an SLC80 of 20 dB, the effective noise at the ear is approximately 80 dB(A) — within the target range. Selecting a Class 5 product with an SLC80 of 30 dB in the same environment would reduce the level to 70 dB(A), potentially creating situational awareness issues without providing additional health benefit. If you do not have a noise level measurement for your site, the best approach is to arrange a noise assessment with a workplace health and safety professional. Noise dosimeters and sound level meters used for compliance measurement must themselves meet Australian standards. Smartphone apps are not suitable for compliance purposes. SLC80 vs NRR: Why US Ratings Do Not Apply in Australia When purchasing hearing protection online or from international suppliers, you will often see products rated using NRR — Noise Reduction Rating — which is the system used in the United States under EPA regulations. NRR is not the same as SLC80, and the two numbers cannot be directly compared or substituted for one another. NRR is derived from laboratory testing under ideal conditions and is typically expressed as a higher number than SLC80 for equivalent products, partly because the testing methodology does not apply the same real-world correction factor. In practice, the US EPA itself recommends workers and employers derate NRR values by 50% to reflect typical real-world performance, which means an NRR 30 product in practice provides roughly 15 dB of usable protection — but this is still expressed in a different framework from SLC80. In Australia, compliance with WHS regulations requires hearing protection that meets AS/NZS 1270. A product rated only under NRR — with no AS/NZS 1270 marking — has not been tested and classified to the Australian standard. You cannot confirm its class, its SLC80 value, or whether it meets the legal requirements for use as PPE in an Australian workplace. Some products sold in Australia carry both NRR and SLC80 ratings because the manufacturer has had them tested to both standards. In that case, use only the SLC80 value for compliance purposes. When purchasing hearing protection for an Australian workplace, always check for the AS/NZS 1270 mark and the class number on the packaging. Types of Earplugs: Disposable Foam, Reusable, Corded, and Banded Earplugs are inserted directly into the ear canal to block sound. The four main types in common industrial use are disposable foam, reusable (pre-moulded or custom), corded, and banded (also called pod or canal cap earplugs). Disposable foam earplugs are the most widely used type in Australian industrial and construction environments. They are made from slow-recovery polyurethane foam that conforms to the shape of the ear canal when correctly inserted. The foam expands against the canal walls to form an acoustic seal. When new and correctly fitted, high-quality disposable foam earplugs typically achieve Class 4–5 SLC80 ratings — among the highest attenuation available from any hearing protection type. The critical word is "correctly." Disposable foam earplugs have the highest attenuation potential of any common hearing protection format, but they also have the highest sensitivity to fitting technique. A poorly fitted foam earplug may achieve only 30–50% of its rated attenuation. Fitting technique is covered in detail in a later section of this guide. Disposable foam earplugs should be replaced at least daily, or more frequently in dirty environments. They are single-use in practice — re-rolling and re-inserting a used earplug that has picked up grease, dust, or sweat reduces hygiene and attenuation. Corded earplugs are disposable foam or reusable earplugs joined by a cord, typically worn around the neck when not in use. The cord prevents the earplug from being dropped or lost when removed temporarily. This is useful in environments where earplugs are put in and taken out frequently — a common scenario in intermittent-noise environments like warehouses or workshops. The cord does not affect attenuation; it is a convenience and hygiene feature. The corded format is also a useful loss-prevention measure in environments where earplugs end up in machinery or food products if dropped. Reusable earplugs are made from silicone, thermoplastic rubber, or other durable materials that can be washed and reused multiple times. Pre-moulded reusable earplugs come in one-size or multiple-size variants. They are inserted without rolling or pre-compressing. Because they do not rely on foam expansion to form a seal, correct fit depends on choosing the right size — a pre-moulded earplug that is too small will not seal adequately. Reusable earplugs are a cost-effective choice for workers who use hearing protection consistently and are trained in correct size selection. They are also more practical in environments where bare hands cannot be maintained — dirty or greasy hands contaminate a foam earplug during the rolling and insertion process in a way they do not contaminate a reusable plug that is simply inserted. Banded earplugs (canal caps / pod earplugs) consist of foam or rubber pods mounted on a flexible band that holds them at the ear canal entrance without full insertion. Because they do not seal inside the canal, they achieve lower attenuation than fully inserted earplugs — typically Class 1–3. Their advantage is convenience: they can be quickly moved from one ear to between uses without handling, making them practical for intermittent noise environments where workers move in and out of loud areas frequently. They are not appropriate as primary protection in high-noise sustained-exposure environments. Types of Earmuffs: Passive Overhead, Cap-Mounted, and Electronic Earmuffs enclose the entire outer ear in cushioned cups that press against the skull to create an acoustic seal. They do not require ear canal insertion and are therefore less dependent on individual fitting technique for their basic function — though seal integrity remains important and is affected by glasses, hair, and correct cup positioning. Passive overhead earmuffs are the standard format: two cushioned cups connected by a headband, worn over the top of the head. The cushions press against the skull around the ear and the rigid cups attenuate noise by both reflection and absorption. Passive earmuffs provide reliable, consistent protection that is straightforward to apply and remove. Most industrial-grade overhead earmuffs achieve Class 4–5 ratings. They are robust, washable (cushions are replaceable), and well suited to sustained noise exposure in fixed locations such as at machinery or on production lines. Cap-mounted earmuffs attach to the brim of a hard hat rather than sitting on a headband. They are essential in environments where both head protection and hearing protection must be worn simultaneously — construction sites, civil works, mining, and any WHS environment that mandates hard hats. Cap-mounted earmuffs fold out of the way when not needed and flip into position over the ears when entering a noise hazard zone. Their attenuation is generally comparable to overhead earmuffs, though seal pressure and consistency can vary more with cap-mounted formats depending on the specific product and hard hat combination. Electronic earmuffs (also called active noise reduction or ANR earmuffs) are covered in detail in a later section. The headline: they use microphones and speakers inside the cups to allow normal speech and situational awareness through at safe levels while automatically compressing or blocking sounds above a threshold. This makes them valuable in environments with intermittent high-noise events (nail guns, impact tools, occasional vehicle movement) and where communication remains necessary during work. Electronic earmuffs are standard in shooting sports and are increasingly used in construction, defence, and emergency services. Earplugs vs Earmuffs: How to Choose Neither earplugs nor earmuffs are universally superior. The right choice depends on the noise level, the work environment, the duration and pattern of noise exposure, other PPE being worn, and the individual worker's anatomy and task requirements. Choose earplugs when: Workers also wear hard hats (earmuffs can be worn with hard hats via cap mounts, but overhead earmuffs and hard hats create logistical friction) The environment is hot or physically demanding and earmuff cushion sweat is an issue Workers need to wear hearing protection for extended periods — earplugs are lighter and create less neck strain The noise level is very high and maximum attenuation (Class 4–5) is needed from a single device Workers wear glasses and the glasses arms may compromise earmuff seal Choose earmuffs when: Workers move in and out of noise hazard zones frequently — earmuffs can be removed and replaced in seconds without hand contact with the ear Ear canal hygiene is a concern — earmuffs do not require handling of the ear canal Workers have ear canal conditions (ear infections, perforations, sensory sensitivities) that prevent earplug use Electronic/communication features are required Training and supervision make consistent correct fitting of earplugs unreliable The noise is intermittent rather than sustained — earmuffs are faster to apply for short noise events For sustained very high noise exposure (above 105 dB(A) LAeq,8h), a single device may not provide sufficient protection and double protection should be considered. For most standard industrial environments in the 85–100 dB(A) range, either a correctly fitted Class 3–4 earplug or a Class 3–4 earmuff will meet the protection requirement. Electronic Earmuffs: How Active Noise Reduction Works Electronic earmuffs look externally similar to passive earmuffs, but include microphones mounted on the outside of the cups, an electronic processing circuit, and speakers inside the cups. Sound from the external microphones is processed and replayed through the internal speakers at a safe level — typically allowing speech and environmental sounds below 82–85 dB(A) to pass through normally. When the external sound exceeds the threshold, the circuit either compresses it sharply or cuts off entirely, depending on the product design. The result is hearing protection that does not isolate the wearer from their environment. Workers can hold a normal conversation and hear radio communications, vehicle reversing alarms, and warning signals while remaining protected from impulse noise events such as gunshots, nail gun discharge, jackhammer impacts, or machinery start-up peaks. This situational awareness feature is the primary reason electronic earmuffs are preferred in certain environments. A passive Class 4 earmuff may block warning signals, reduce awareness of approaching vehicles or machinery, and create communication difficulties that lead workers to remove the protection during noise events — the worst possible outcome. An electronic earmuff at equivalent passive attenuation allows the wearer to keep the protection on continuously because normal communication is possible. Key specifications to look for in electronic earmuffs: Passive SLC80 / Class rating: This is the protection provided when the electronics are off or the batteries die. Always check this — some consumer-grade electronic earmuffs have very low passive ratings. Compression threshold: The sound level at which the circuit activates and limits the passthrough audio. Typically 82–85 dB(A). Attack time: How quickly the limiter responds to a sudden loud sound. Faster is better for impulse noise environments like shooting. Frequency response: Better-quality units amplify speech frequencies to make communication clearer, rather than simply passing through all frequencies equally. Battery life: Alkaline AA or AAA cells are common; auto-shutoff is a useful feature. AUX input / Bluetooth: Some models support radio or phone connectivity for communication-intensive environments. Cap-mounted versions of electronic earmuffs are available and are essential where hard hat use is mandatory alongside hearing protection and communication requirements — civil works, mining site supervisors, and similar roles. Double Protection: When to Combine Earplugs and Earmuffs Double protection — wearing both earplugs and earmuffs simultaneously — is appropriate when a single device cannot provide sufficient attenuation for the noise level. The relevant Australian guidance recommends double protection when the noise level exceeds 105 dB(A) LAeq,8h or when the attenuation required from a single device cannot be achieved by any product meeting AS/NZS 1270. The critical point about double protection: the combined SLC80 value is not the sum of the two individual SLC80 values. You do not add the ratings together. The combined attenuation from double protection is typically estimated as the higher SLC80 value of the two devices plus 5 dB. This reflects the fact that once attenuation exceeds a certain level, sound transmission through bone conduction and the skull itself becomes the limiting factor, and additional cup or plug attenuation yields diminishing returns. Example: Class 5 earplug (SLC80 = 30 dB) + Class 4 earmuff (SLC80 = 25 dB) = approximately 35 dB combined — not 55 dB. Environments where double protection is typically required or recommended include: airport apron operations, jet engine maintenance, blasting areas in mining and demolition, some heavy press operations, and certain power generation facilities. Defence personnel may use double protection as standard during training and operations involving firearms. Double protection also creates a communication challenge: workers wearing both earplugs and earmuffs have very limited ability to hear speech or warning signals. In these environments, electronic earmuffs (over earplugs) are strongly preferred because they restore situational awareness at the earmuff level while the earplugs provide additional attenuation of the extreme noise baseline. How to Correctly Fit Foam Earplugs Correct insertion of a foam earplug is the single biggest factor in whether the product delivers its rated protection. An improperly inserted foam earplug may attenuate 5–10 dB less than its SLC80 rating, effectively reducing a Class 5 product to Class 3 performance — or worse. The insertion process has four steps and takes around 20–30 seconds per ear. Step 1: Roll Using clean, dry hands, take the earplug and roll it between your fingers into a thin, smooth cylinder. The aim is to compress the foam as evenly as possible into the smallest diameter that allows insertion. Do not simply pinch or squeeze — roll it. The cylinder should be no more than 4–5mm in diameter when fully rolled. If the foam springs back quickly, keep rolling or pinch the tip to hold compression while inserting. Step 2: Pull Reach over your head with the opposite hand and pull the outer ear (pinna) up and back. For the right ear, use your left hand; for the left ear, use your right hand. Pulling the pinna up and back straightens the ear canal, which is slightly curved in its natural state. Without this step, the earplug meets the curve of the canal rather than seating fully within it. Step 3: Insert While still holding the pinna up and back, use your other hand to insert the rolled earplug into the ear canal with a gentle forward and slightly downward pressure. The earplug should go in deeply enough that it is almost flush with or slightly proud of the canal entrance. If the earplug is still substantially protruding from the ear, it is not inserted far enough and will not seal effectively. Step 4: Hold Keep your finger gently pressed against the earplug for 20–30 seconds while the foam expands to fill the canal. Do not release pressure too early — the foam needs time to expand against the canal walls and form a complete acoustic seal. Once you release, the earplug should sit securely in the canal without being pushed out by the foam's expansion. Check your fit: A correctly fitted foam earplug produces a noticeable reduction in environmental sound when you speak — your own voice should sound hollow or "plugged." This is a practical field check. You can also try a gentle tug on the earplug — it should resist removal slightly, indicating the seal is engaged. If it comes out easily, re-roll and re-insert. How to Correctly Fit Earmuffs Earmuffs are simpler to fit than foam earplugs but are not fail-safe. Seal integrity is the critical variable — anything that breaks the seal between the cushion and the skull reduces attenuation substantially. Position the cups correctly: Each cup should fully enclose the outer ear with the cushion making even contact with the skull around the entire circumference of the ear. The headband should sit over the top of the head — not at an angle. Tilted or off-centre cups reduce attenuation. Some earmuffs have an adjustable headband; adjust it until the cups sit evenly without needing to hold them in place. Adjust headband tension: The cushions need enough pressure against the skull to maintain the seal, but not so much that wearing becomes uncomfortable over a shift. Most overhead earmuffs allow headband adjustment. If the cushions are barely in contact with the skull, the seal is compromised. If the headband pressure is causing headache or soreness, adjust or consider a different product with a softer headband. Account for glasses: Glasses arms (temples) pass between the earmuff cushion and the skull, breaking the seal at two points. This is one of the most common and least understood sources of earmuff attenuation loss. The thicker the temple arm, the greater the breach. Solutions include using thin-profile safety glasses, wearing safety glasses over the earmuffs (where the design allows), choosing earmuffs with softer, more conformable cushions that adapt around the temple arm, or switching to safety goggles that do not use temple arms. Account for hair: Long hair, high buns, or hair clips caught under the cushion all compromise the seal. Hair should be moved clear of the cushion contact area before fitting earmuffs. This is particularly important with ear-covering hairstyles that may seem out of the way but create a pathway for sound at the cushion edge. Cap-mounted earmuffs: Ensure the cups are correctly adjusted to the wearer's head width and that the hard hat is sitting correctly on the head before flipping the ear cups into position. An incorrectly positioned hard hat will cause the cup attachment mechanism to push the cups out of position relative to the ears. Common Fitting Mistakes That Eliminate Protection Understanding what goes wrong is as important as knowing the correct technique. These are the most common errors observed in workplace hearing protection use: Not rolling foam earplugs fully before insertion. Workers who are unfamiliar with the technique or in a hurry often insert a foam earplug that has been only lightly compressed. The earplug does not seat deeply in the canal and does not form an adequate seal. The earplug is visibly prominent in the ear — a quick visual check supervisors can use. Not pulling the pinna back before insertion. Without straightening the ear canal, the earplug meets the curve of the canal and sits in the outer portion only. Full depth insertion requires the pinna pull — always. Not holding the earplug while it expands. Releasing before expansion is complete allows the foam's expansion force to push the earplug back toward the canal entrance. Workers who insert and immediately remove their finger get a shallower seal than the product is capable of. Using a dirty or contaminated earplug. A used foam earplug that has absorbed sweat or picked up oil or dust should be discarded. Contamination stiffens the foam, reduces its ability to conform to the canal, and creates hygiene risks. Disposable earplugs are designed for single-shift use. Wearing earmuffs over-ear rather than fully enclosing the ear. The cup must surround the outer ear entirely, with the cushion on the skull — not resting on the cartilage of the outer ear. Earmuffs worn with the cup partially on the ear rather than around it achieve dramatically reduced attenuation. Allowing glasses arms to breach the earmuff seal without compensation. As noted above, uncorrected glasses-cushion interference can reduce earmuff attenuation by 5–15 dB — enough to shift a Class 4 product into Class 2 effective performance. Removing protection for short periods in noise. This is the most consequential error. During a 30-minute grinding session at 105 dB(A), removing protection for just two minutes reduces the effective protection for that entire session from the rated SLC80 value to almost nothing, because the accumulated dose during those unprotected two minutes dominates the overall exposure calculation. Using hearing protection rated too low for the environment. Class 1 earmuffs in a 105 dB(A) grinding environment provide compliance theatre, not actual protection. The class must be matched to the noise level. Hearing Protection for Specific Environments Different work environments create different noise profiles, different coexisting PPE requirements, and different communication demands. Here is a practical breakdown of the most common industrial contexts: Construction and civil works: Noise levels vary widely by task — concrete cutting at 105+ dB(A) (see the Diamond Blade Guide for the cutting tool side), general site noise at 85–95 dB(A). Hard hat mandates make cap-mounted earmuffs the practical default. Where precision task-switching is frequent (workers regularly entering and exiting noise zones), corded earplugs in a neck cord wallet or banded earplugs for easy access are useful. Communication with other workers and with vehicles/plant makes electronic earmuffs highly valuable for supervisors and workers who need to communicate while protected. Manufacturing and production lines: Sustained, consistent noise from machinery typically in the 90–100 dB(A) range. Full-shift protection requirements favour foam earplugs (comfortable for long wear) or overhead earmuffs where workers are not mobile. Cap-mounted earmuffs are generally not needed unless the facility also mandates hard hats. Corded earplugs reduce the replacement frequency from workers dropping and losing earplugs. Grinding, cutting, and angle grinding: Angle grinders and cutting tools typically generate 100–108 dB(A) at the operator position. Class 4–5 protection is required. A Class 5 foam earplug correctly fitted is appropriate. Workers often also need face shields or safety glasses, which makes earmuffs less convenient — foam earplugs avoid the glasses-seal interference issue. Shooting sports and range use: Firearms generate impulse noise events of 140–165 dB(C) peak — well above the peak pressure exposure standard of 140 dB(C). This is a category where electronic earmuffs are strongly preferred: they allow normal communication between shooters, permit range commands to be heard clearly, and compress the impulse noise event instantaneously. Class 5 passive earmuffs are also effective for sustained firing but eliminate the ability to communicate. For high-intensity competition or military training, double protection (Class 5 earplugs + Class 4–5 electronic earmuffs) is recommended. Aviation and airports: Ground crew on airport aprons are exposed to jet engine noise at 140+ dB(A) depending on proximity. Double protection is standard — Class 5 earplugs under Class 5 earmuffs, with the combined effective attenuation of approximately 35 dB. Communication headsets integrated into earmuff cups are used for air traffic communication. Maintenance personnel working inside engine bays or near auxiliary power units face similar requirements. Warehousing and logistics: Forklift operations, pallet jack use, and loading dock activity typically generate 85–95 dB(A). The intermittent nature of the noise and the frequent need to communicate with other workers makes electronic earmuffs or banded earplugs practical for noise zones, with corded foam earplugs as a lower-cost alternative for sustained-exposure areas. Woodworking and cabinet making: Table saws, routers, and planers produce 90–105 dB(A). The sawdust-laden environment makes earmuff cushion hygiene a consideration — cushions must be wiped down and replaced regularly. Foam earplugs avoid this issue but become impractical for workers who are also wearing dust masks, as the breathing exertion from intensive physical work makes the ear canal area humid and fitting more difficult. How to Choose the Right Hearing Protection: A Decision Guide Use this framework to select appropriate hearing protection for a given task or environment: Step 1: Establish the noise level. If you do not have a measured noise level, arrange a noise assessment. In the meantime, use the conservative approach: if you need to raise your voice for normal conversation at one metre distance, assume 85 dB(A) or above. Step 2: Determine the required SLC80 class. Use the table earlier in this guide to match the environmental noise level to the appropriate class. Remember the target: effective noise at the ear should be 75–80 dB(A). Selecting a higher class than needed creates over-protection and situational awareness risk. Step 3: Consider coexisting PPE. If a hard hat is mandatory, either cap-mounted earmuffs or earplugs are the practical choices. If safety glasses or goggles are required, consider the glasses-seal interference issue with earmuffs and whether earplugs would be more appropriate. Step 4: Assess communication requirements. If workers need to communicate, hear warning signals, or operate radios while protected, electronic earmuffs are worth the investment. In environments where communication is not critical and workers are in sustained noise, passive earplugs or earmuffs are appropriate. Step 5: Consider exposure pattern. For intermittent noise exposure with frequent entry and exit from noise zones, earmuffs (faster to apply and remove) or banded earplugs are more practical than foam earplugs. For sustained full-shift exposure in a fixed location, foam earplugs offer the best attenuation and comfort for extended wear. Step 6: Verify AS/NZS 1270 compliance. Check that the product carries the AS/NZS 1270 mark and the SLC80 class on its packaging. Products rated only under NRR or lacking Australian standard compliance cannot be used for WHS compliance in an Australian workplace. Step 7: Train workers in correct fit. The product class only delivers its rated protection when worn correctly. Fitting training — especially for foam earplugs — is not optional. Build it into induction and safety refreshers. AIMS Industrial stocks a range of hearing protection compliant with AS/NZS 1270, from Class 5 foam earplugs in corded and uncorded formats through to electronic earmuffs with active noise reduction and cap-mount capability. View the full range at AIMS ear protection. Frequently Asked Questions What is SLC80 and how does it differ from NRR? SLC80 (Sound Level Conversion at the 80th percentile) is the Australian hearing protection rating system specified in AS/NZS 1270:2002. It represents the noise reduction achievable for 80% of wearers with correct fit. NRR (Noise Reduction Rating) is the US system used under EPA regulations. The two values are not interchangeable. NRR figures are typically higher than SLC80 for equivalent products because of different testing methodology. For Australian workplaces, only the SLC80 class — not NRR — is valid for WHS compliance purposes. What SLC80 class do I need for working with an angle grinder? Angle grinders typically generate 100–108 dB(A) at the operator position. For this range, you need at minimum a Class 4 product (SLC80 22–25 dB) and ideally Class 5 (SLC80 26+ dB). A correctly fitted Class 5 disposable foam earplug is the most common choice for grinding work, as foam earplugs avoid the seal-interference issues that arise when wearing earmuffs with safety glasses. Can I use US NRR-rated hearing protection in an Australian workplace? No. Australian WHS regulations require hearing protection that complies with AS/NZS 1270. A product rated only under NRR has not been tested or classified to the Australian standard. Its SLC80 class cannot be confirmed, and it cannot be used to demonstrate WHS compliance. Some products carry both NRR and SLC80 ratings — in that case, use only the SLC80 value for Australian compliance purposes. What is the difference between Class 3 and Class 5 hearing protection? Class 3 hearing protection has an SLC80 of 18–21 dB and is appropriate for noise levels up to approximately 100 dB(A). Class 5 has an SLC80 of 26+ dB and is appropriate for noise levels up to approximately 110 dB(A). The practical difference is the amount of attenuation provided — Class 5 products reduce the noise level at the ear by roughly 26–30 dB, compared to 18–21 dB for Class 3. Selecting too low a class for the actual noise level means insufficient protection; selecting too high a class can over-protect and create situational awareness risks. How do I correctly fit foam earplugs? Correctly fitting a foam earplug requires four steps: (1) Roll the earplug into a thin cylinder using clean, dry fingers; (2) Pull the outer ear up and back with the opposite hand to straighten the ear canal; (3) Insert the rolled earplug deeply into the canal while maintaining the ear pull; (4) Hold it in place for 20–30 seconds while the foam expands to fill the canal. A correctly fitted earplug should sit almost flush with the canal entrance. Missing any of these steps — especially the pull and hold — significantly reduces the attenuation achieved. When should I use double hearing protection (earplugs and earmuffs together)? Double protection is recommended when the noise level exceeds 105 dB(A) LAeq,8h, or when no single device provides sufficient attenuation for the noise level. Note that the combined SLC80 value is not the sum of both ratings. The combined protection is typically estimated as the higher SLC80 value plus 5 dB, because bone conduction through the skull limits the additional benefit of stacking two devices. Electronic earmuffs worn over earplugs are preferable for double protection in environments where communication and situational awareness are also required. Do glasses affect earmuff protection? Yes. Glasses temple arms (the arms that pass over the ears) break the seal between the earmuff cushion and the skull. This can reduce earmuff attenuation by 5–15 dB depending on the thickness of the temple arm — enough to reduce effective performance by one or two classes. Solutions include using thin-profile safety glasses, selecting earmuffs with soft conformable cushions that adapt around the temple, wearing safety goggles that do not use temple arms, or switching to earplugs in environments where both hearing and eye protection are required. What are electronic earmuffs and when should I use them? Electronic earmuffs use external microphones and internal speakers to pass through ambient sound and speech at a safe level (typically below 82–85 dB(A)) while compressing or blocking sounds above that threshold. This allows normal communication and situational awareness while protecting against noise peaks and impulse events. Use electronic earmuffs when: workers need to communicate while protected; the environment has intermittent impulse noise (gunshots, nail guns, impact tools); or warning signals and vehicle alarms must be heard. Check both the passive SLC80 class and the compression threshold when selecting. How often should I replace disposable foam earplugs? Disposable foam earplugs should be replaced at least once per shift, or more frequently in dirty, dusty, or high-humidity environments. A used earplug that has absorbed sweat, grease, or dust has reduced foam compliance and cannot conform to the ear canal as effectively as a new plug. Re-rolling and re-inserting a contaminated earplug also creates a hygiene risk. Treat disposable earplugs as single-shift consumables. Is it possible to wear hearing protection that is rated too high? Yes. Over-protection — using a higher class than the noise level requires — reduces the noise level at the ear below 70 dB(A), which impairs the ability to hear speech, warning signals, vehicle reversing alarms, and other situational cues. Workers who cannot hear warnings may be at greater risk of injury from other causes than noise itself. The target noise level at the ear after protection is 75–80 dB(A). Selecting the appropriate class — not the highest available class — is correct practice. What hearing protection is best for construction sites? Construction sites typically mandate hard hats, which makes cap-mounted earmuffs or earplugs the practical options. For supervisors and workers who communicate frequently, cap-mounted electronic earmuffs offer the best combination of hearing protection and situational awareness. For workers in sustained-noise zones such as near generators or compressors, corded Class 4–5 foam earplugs are a cost-effective and comfortable choice. Match the class to the specific noise level at each work zone — not all areas of a construction site are at the same noise level. How do I know if my hearing protection is adequate for my workplace? Adequate hearing protection reduces the noise level at your ear to 75–80 dB(A). To verify this: measure or obtain the measured noise level at your work location (in dB(A) LAeq,8h); confirm your product's SLC80 value from the packaging; subtract the SLC80 from the noise level. If the result is between 75 and 80 dB(A), the product class is appropriate and correctly fitted protection is adequate. If it is above 80 dB(A), upgrade to a higher class or consider double protection. If it is below 70 dB(A), consider a lower class to restore situational awareness. People Also Ask — Hearing Protection Q: What is the difference between SLC80 and NRR ratings on hearing protection? SLC80 (Sound Level Conversion at 80th percentile) is the Australian and New Zealand rating method under AS/NZS 1270, indicating the protection level achieved by 80% of wearers. NRR (Noise Reduction Rating) is the US-based ANSI rating. When selecting hearing protection in Australia, use SLC80-rated products and compare ratings under the same standard. Importing products rated only in NRR requires conversion to ensure compliance with local requirements. Q: What class of hearing protection do I need for my work environment? Australian Standard AS/NZS 1270 classifies hearing protectors into five classes based on the noise level they attenuate. Class 1 provides the least attenuation for mildly noisy environments, while Class 5 provides the highest protection for extreme noise levels. Select the class appropriate to your workplace noise exposure — over-protecting in lower-noise environments can reduce situational awareness and communication, creating other safety risks. Q: Are earmuffs or earplugs better for hearing protection? Neither is universally better — each suits different situations. Earmuffs are easier to fit correctly, more comfortable for intermittent use, and easier to inspect. Earplugs generally achieve higher SLC80 ratings, are more compact, and work better under helmets or when wearing other head PPE. For sustained high-noise environments, some workers use both simultaneously. Proper fitting of either type is critical to achieving the rated protection level. Q: How do I know if I need hearing protection in my workplace? Under Australian WHS legislation, hearing protection is required when noise exposure reaches or exceeds 85 dB(A) as an eight-hour time-weighted average (TWA), or when peak sound pressure exceeds 140 dB(C). A noise assessment should be conducted by a competent person to measure actual exposure levels. Until formal assessment is completed, if you need to raise your voice to be heard at arm's length, assume hearing protection is required. Q: How often should hearing protection be replaced? Earplugs designed for single use must be discarded after each use. Reusable earplugs should be inspected before each use and replaced when they become stiff, cracked, or no longer spring back after rolling. Earmuffs should have the foam cushions replaced at least annually or when they harden, crack, or no longer seal effectively against the head. Damaged or poorly fitting hearing protection provides substantially less protection than its rated SLC80 value. Need retaining ring pliers? Browse the AIMS range at retaining ring pliers.
Read moreProduct Guides
types-of-work-gloves
Walk into any industrial supplier and you'll find a wall of work gloves. Leather. Nitrile. Cut-resistant. Chemical. Anti-vibration. Welding..
Read moreStay Cool, Stay Productive: A Guide to Working in Hot Conditions
Summer is here, and with it comes the risk of heat-related illnesses. Learn how to stay safe and productive during extreme heat.
Read moreFAQs on Sqwincher Hydration Products
Customers have been asking us these questions about the brand. We’ve compiled the answers here.
Read moreWork Gloves Guide: EN 388, AS/NZS 2161 & Selection
Work gloves in Australia are governed by the AS/NZS 2161 series, which adopts the European EN 388 (mechanical), EN 407 (heat), EN 511 (cold), EN 374 (chemical) and EN 60903 (electrical) test methods. The EN 388 rating prints four digits (abrasion 0–4, blade cut Coupe 0–5, tear 0–4, puncture 0–4) plus an ISO 13997 Cut Level letter (A–F) and an optional P for impact. Choose the lowest cut level that genuinely covers the hazard — over-specified gloves get refused, get pocketed, and end up not worn. Bookmark our Engineering Reference Charts hub for related Australian-standard references, sizing tables and PPE selection guides. Glove Selection — Quick Reference by Application Application Recommended Type Min Cut Level Key Feature General handling / warehousing Knit + PU or nitrile coating A1 (Cut 1) Dexterity Construction / building Leather rigger or coated knit A2–A3 (Cut 2–3) Abrasion + grip Mining surface / underground HPPE liner + nitrile/foam grip A4–A5 (Cut 4) Oil/water grip Metal fabrication / sheet work HPPE / aramid + leather palm A5–A6 (Cut 5) Cut + heat combo Glass handling / automotive glass HPPE with steel/glass-fibre wrap A7–A9 (Cut 5+ TDM) High cut score Chemical handling / decanting Nitrile, neoprene, butyl, Viton n/a — EN 374 Breakthrough time Welding (MMAW / Stick) Leather gauntlet n/a — EN 407 Heat + spatter Welding (TIG) Goatskin or kidskin n/a — EN 407 Dexterity Cold storage / freezer work Insulated knit + HPT or PVC A2+ (Cut 2) EN 511 cold Hot work / foundry Kevlar / aramid / leather n/a — EN 407 Contact + radiant heat Live electrical work Class 00–4 rubber insulating n/a — EN 60903 Voltage rating Food prep / pharma / medical Disposable nitrile / vinyl A3+ underglove if cutting Single-use, AQL This guide focuses on selection methodology, standards and materials. For a category-by-category walkthrough of specific glove ranges (rigger, mechanic, disposable, leather, knit, anti-vibration, etc.), see our companion Work Glove Types: A Complete Guide. This article is the standards-and-selection hub. AS/NZS 2161 Series — The Australian Framework Australia and New Zealand adopt the European glove-testing methodology under the AS/NZS 2161 series. Each part covers a different hazard category. The structure is important because compliance and labelling for the Australian market reference the AS/NZS part number — not the underlying EN standard alone. Standard Scope Equivalent EN Standard AS/NZS 2161.1 General requirements and test methods — terminology, sizing, marking, packaging information EN 420 (now EN ISO 21420) AS/NZS 2161.2 Mechanical hazards — abrasion, cut, tear, puncture (and impact in later revisions) EN 388 AS/NZS 2161.10 Chemical and microbiological hazards — permeation, penetration, degradation EN 374 AS/NZS 2161.4 Thermal hazards (heat and flame) — flammability, contact heat, convective heat, radiant heat, molten metal splash EN 407 AS/NZS 2161.5 Cold protection — contact cold, convective cold, water penetration EN 511 AS/NZS 2161.6 Electrical insulating gloves — voltage class 00 to 4 EN 60903 / IEC 60903 AS/NZS 2161.2 current edition is 2020 (replaced 2005); AS/NZS 2161.10 covers chemical and microbiological protection — historical 2005 edition has been progressively replaced through the 2020 cycle. Confirm with the Standards Australia catalogue before quoting an exact year in technical documentation. A glove rated to AS/NZS 2161.2 must also meet AS/NZS 2161.1 (the general requirements). When you read a label or spec sheet, the part number tells you which hazards it has been tested against. A glove tested only against AS/NZS 2161.2 is not certified for chemical protection regardless of how it feels in the hand. EN 388 / AS/NZS 2161.2 — The Mechanical Rating Explained The four-digit EN 388 rating you see printed on the back of a glove (often followed by one or two letters) is the most commonly misread number in PPE selection. Each digit and letter represents a separate test result. The four digits — read left to right Position Hazard Scale Test method 1 Abrasion resistance 0–4 Martindale cycles to wear through 2 Blade cut resistance (Coupe) 0–5 Rotating circular blade, cycles to cut through 3 Tear resistance 0–4 Force in Newtons to propagate a tear 4 Puncture resistance 0–4 Force in Newtons to push a steel stylus through The optional letters — added by EN 388:2016 Position Rating Scale Test method 5 ISO 13997 Cut (TDM) A–F Single blade-edge pass, force in Newtons to cut at 20mm travel 6 Impact protection P (pass) or blank EN 13594 method — knuckle / back-of-hand padding Abrasion levels (digit 1) Level Martindale cycles to wear through What it means in practice 1 ≥ 100 Very light duty — short-use disposable 2 ≥ 500 Light handling, short-shift use 3 ≥ 2,000 Standard industrial — most general-purpose gloves 4 ≥ 8,000 Heavy-duty — leather riggers, premium HPPE Blade cut — Coupe (digit 2) vs ISO 13997 (letter) The Coupe test (digit 2) uses a rotating circular blade that loses sharpness against highly cut-resistant materials. This means a HPPE or steel-wrapped glove that should rate 5 sometimes scores artificially high because the blade dulls during testing. The EN 388:2016 revision added the ISO 13997 TDM test (the A–F letter) to fix this — TDM uses a fresh straight blade and a constant draw, giving a reliable result for high-cut materials. For any glove rated 3 or higher on Coupe, the ISO 13997 letter is the value you should select against. Coupe Level Cycles to cut ISO 13997 Letter Force at 20mm (Newtons) Typical use 1 1.2 A 2 N Very light, basic abrasion only 2 2.5 B 5 N Light assembly, packaging 3 5.0 C 10 N General industrial, light cutting hazards 4 10.0 D 15 N Steel handling, light sheet metal 5 20.0 E 22 N Heavy steel work, automotive assembly — — F 30 N Glass handling, pulp and paper, recycling sorting Practical mapping: A glove printed "4543B" means abrasion 4 (top tier), Coupe cut 5 (top of Coupe scale), tear 4, puncture 3, ISO 13997 Cut B. The Coupe rating of 5 should be treated with caution if you're choosing for genuine high-cut work — the TDM letter "B" is the more honest number, telling you it really only stops a 5 Newton draw cut. For aviation glass or recycling sort lines, that's not enough. Tear and puncture (digits 3 and 4) Tear resistance measures the force needed to propagate an existing nick or hole — relevant when working around staples, wire ends or rough timber. Puncture resistance measures resistance to a blunt steel stylus pushed straight through — relevant for needle, splinter and broken-wire hazards. Puncture under EN 388 is not a hypodermic-needle test; needle puncture is covered separately under ANSI/ISEA 105 in the US (no direct AS/NZS equivalent). For medical, recycling sort lines and waste handling, ANSI needle-stick rated gloves are the relevant specification. Impact protection (the P) Added in EN 388:2016, the P marking confirms the glove passed the EN 13594 impact test on the back of the hand and knuckles. Impact-rated gloves (TPR or hard-plastic backing) are standard in oil and gas, mining and heavy mechanical work where dropped tools, swung wrenches and hand-pinch hazards are routine. The test is pass/fail — there's no Level 1/Level 2 for impact under EN 388 (a separate ANSI/ISEA 138 standard does grade impact 1–3). Cut Levels A–F: When You Actually Need Each Level The ISO 13997 / EN 388 Cut Level letter is the most useful single number for matching a glove to a cutting hazard. Here is what each level genuinely covers — and the trade-off in dexterity that comes with each step up. Cut Level Newtons at 20mm Real-world hazard it covers Industry examples A 2 N Paper-cut grade — light handling, packaging, general assembly. Cardboard, fibre board. Warehousing, retail handling, light food prep (with disposable over-glove) B 5 N Light blade exposure — handling boxed product with razor blades inside, light maintenance. Light fabrication, automotive assembly trim, electronics C 10 N Standard industrial cut hazard — sheet steel edges, banding strap, light glass. General construction, sheet metal work, ducting fabrication D 15 N Heavier sheet steel, structural fabrication, light glass handling. Structural steel, light glazing, automotive body shop, mining surface E 22 N Heavy steel edges, light automotive glass, knife handling (food processing line). Heavy steel, glass cutting, abattoir / meat processing F 30 N+ High-risk: aviation glass, recycling sort lines, scrap metal handling, knife / blade sorting. Glass manufacturing, materials recovery facilities, sharps recycling ⚠️ Match the cut level to the actual hazard. A worker given Cut F gloves for a Cut B task will refuse to wear them after the first hour — they're stiff, hot and clumsy compared to a thin coated knit. PPE that gets pocketed protects nobody. Run the risk assessment on the genuine cutting load on the job, not the worst-case-imaginable load. EN 374 / AS/NZS 2161.10 — Chemical Protection Chemical gloves are rated against three properties: permeation (chemical passing through the intact glove material at the molecular level), penetration (chemical passing through a defect — pinhole, seam failure) and degradation (the glove material physically breaking down). The most important single number is the breakthrough time — how long it takes a specific chemical to permeate the material under continuous exposure. EN 374 Performance Level Breakthrough Time Practical interpretation Level 1 > 10 minutes Splash protection only — remove and replace immediately on contact Level 2 > 30 minutes Brief handling Level 3 > 60 minutes Standard chemical handling Level 4 > 120 minutes Extended handling Level 5 > 240 minutes Full-shift use against specified chemical Level 6 > 480 minutes Maximum-duration use EN 374 labels list breakthrough against a panel of test chemicals identified by code letters (A through T). Examples: A = methanol, B = acetone, C = acetonitrile, D = dichloromethane, E = carbon disulphide, F = toluene, G = diethylamine, K = sodium hydroxide 40%, L = sulphuric acid 96%, etc. This is the trap most chemical-glove purchasers fall into: a glove rated EN 374 Type A against six chemicals tells you nothing about how it performs against the specific chemical you're actually decanting. Always cross-reference the chemical you're working with against the manufacturer's permeation chart. Don't assume "chemical-resistant" means "resistant to your chemical". Type A, Type B, Type C — coverage breadth EN 374-1:2016 added a Type classification based on how many chemicals from the test panel the glove resists at Level 2 (30 min) or better: Type A — at least 6 chemicals from the panel at Level 2 or better. Highest coverage. Type B — at least 3 chemicals at Level 2 or better. Type C — at least 1 chemical at Level 1 (> 10 min). Light splash protection only. EN 407 / AS/NZS 2161.4 — Heat and Flame The EN 407 / AS/NZS 2161.4 marking carries a flame icon and a six-digit code. Each digit rates a different thermal hazard. Position Hazard Scale What it means 1 Burning behaviour 0–4 Self-extinguishing time after ignition 2 Contact heat 0–4 Temperature glove can hold for 15s without > 10°C rise inside 3 Convective heat 0–4 Time to transfer specified heat in convection 4 Radiant heat 0–4 Time before back-of-hand reaches 24°C above ambient 5 Small molten metal splashes 0–4 Number of drops to cause specified temperature rise 6 Large molten metal splashes 0–4 Grams of molten metal causing smoothing or pinholes Contact Heat Level Surface Temp Use case 1 100°C Hot water, light catering 2 250°C Light foundry, hot working surfaces 3 350°C Welding contact, hot bar handling 4 500°C Foundry, furnace work EN 511 / AS/NZS 2161.5 — Cold Protection EN 511 / AS/NZS 2161.5 marking carries a snowflake icon and a three-digit code: Position Hazard Scale What it means 1 Convective cold 0–4 Insulation against cold air 2 Contact cold 0–4 Resistance to direct contact with cold surfaces 3 Water penetration 0 or 1 0 = water penetrates after 30 min; 1 = no penetration For Australian cold-storage and freezer work, look for at least Level 2 convective + Level 1 water penetration. For specialised cold-and-wet handling (fishing, abattoir wet line, dairy chilled rooms), Level 1 water penetration is essential — a glove that wicks moisture loses insulation immediately. EN 60903 / AS/NZS 2161.6 — Live Electrical Work Rubber insulating gloves for live electrical work are not general PPE. They are tested to defined voltage classes and must be paired with leather over-gloves to prevent abrasion damage to the dielectric layer. Class Max Use Voltage AC Proof Test Voltage Use case 00 500 V 2,500 V LV switchboard work, light electrical 0 1,000 V 5,000 V LV distribution, secondary systems 1 7,500 V 10,000 V Distribution network 2 17,000 V 20,000 V HV distribution 3 26,500 V 30,000 V HV distribution / sub-transmission 4 36,000 V 40,000 V Sub-transmission ⚠️ Electrical insulating gloves require periodic re-testing. Under AS/NZS 2225 (and many network operator standards), Class 0 and above must be electrically retested every 6 months in service. A glove that has been dropped, exposed to solvents, or stored folded may have invisible dielectric defects. Always inflate-test before use and replace if any pinhole is detected. Pair with AS/NZS 2225-rated leather over-gloves at all times. For live work above LV, consult AS/NZS 4836 and the network operator's procedures. Glove Categories — Quick Reference Category Primary hazard Common materials AS/NZS reference General purpose Light abrasion, dirt, light cut Cotton, polyester knit, PU/nitrile dipped 2161.2 (Cut A–B) Cut resistant Cut, slice, draw cut HPPE (Dyneema/Spectra), aramid (Kevlar/Twaron), glass-fibre wrap, stainless-steel wire 2161.2 (Cut C–F) Chemical resistant Acids, solvents, caustics Nitrile, neoprene, butyl, Viton, PVC, latex 2161.10 Heat resistant Contact heat, radiant heat, flame Kevlar/aramid knit, leather, aluminised, Nomex 2161.4 Cold resistant Convective and contact cold Insulated knit (ThermSmart), insulated nitrile / HPT, fleece-lined leather 2161.5 Electrical insulating Live voltage shock Natural rubber latex (vulcanised), composite dielectric 2161.6 + AS/NZS 2225 Anti-vibration Hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS) Gel-filled palm, foam-padded palm 2161.2 + ISO 10819 Disposable Cross-contamination, light chemical splash Nitrile, latex, vinyl 2161.10 (single-use) Welding Heat, spatter, UV, abrasion Cowhide, kidskin, goatskin, deerskin 2161.2 + 2161.4 Mechanics Abrasion, light cut, oil/grip Synthetic leather palm, spandex back, TPR knuckles 2161.2 (Cut A–C) Rigger Abrasion, cut, drop hazard Split cowhide leather 2161.2 (Cut B–D) Material Properties Reference Material Abrasion Cut Chemical Heat Comfort Cost Cotton knit Low Low Low Low High $ Leather (split cowhide) High Med Low Med Med $$ Leather (goatskin / kidskin) Med Med Low Med High $$$ HPPE (Dyneema / Spectra) High Very high Low Low High $$$ Aramid (Kevlar / Twaron) High High Low High Med $$$ Stainless steel mesh / wire Very high Very high Med High Low $$$$ Nitrile (coating or full) High Low Good (oils, fuels) Low High $$ Neoprene Med Low Good (acids, caustics) Med Med $$ Butyl rubber Low Low Excellent (ketones, esters) Low Low $$$$ Viton (FKM) Low Low Excellent (aromatics, chlorinated solvents) High Low $$$$ Natural rubber latex Med Low Good (water-based, dilute acids) Low High $ PVC Med Low Good (water-based, dilute acids/bases) Low Low $ Polyurethane (PU coating) Med Low Low Low Very high $$ Latex allergy: Type I latex allergy (immediate hypersensitivity to natural rubber proteins) is increasingly common in Australian workplaces, particularly in healthcare and food handling. Nitrile and neoprene are the standard latex-free alternatives. If you have any history of skin reaction to rubber, raise it with your WHS officer before being issued any latex glove — including disposable latex examination gloves. Selection by Application — In Depth Construction and General Building Mixed hazards: abrasion from timber, masonry and steel; light cut from sheet edges; some impact risk from dropped tools. A coated knit with nitrile or PU palm at Cut A2–A3 is the workhorse — Cut B for finer-detail tasks, leather riggers for heavy handling. Look for Abrasion 3 minimum. For trenching, demolition and concrete work, add a foam-gasket or impact-rated back. Mining (Surface and Underground) Mining has the broadest glove demand in Australian industry. Surface mining: Cut A4–A5, oil/water grip coating (nitrile foam), impact-rated back (TPR knuckles), heat tolerance for hot ambient conditions. Underground: similar cut spec plus chemical splash resistance for diesel handling. Cold conditions in WA night shifts and Tasmanian operations push EN 511 cold rating into the spec. Many WA and QLD mining sites mandate Class A4+ minimum for all hands-on production work. Metal Fabrication Sheet steel and section work generates draw-cut hazards from edges. Step up to Cut A5–A6 (TDM E) with leather palm for grip. For welding-adjacent fabrication (positioning, tacking, fit-up before welding), heat-tolerant aramid liner with leather palm bridges the cut and heat hazards. See our Welding Eye Protection Guide for the full PPE picture in welding bays. Welding MMAW (stick) and MAG/MIG: heavy leather gauntlet (cowhide), 30cm+ cuff, lined palm. TIG: thin goatskin or kidskin gauntlet — dexterity is the priority because TIG demands fine torch control. Browse welding gloves for the range. Pair with proper welding helmet selection — a glove rated for the wrong process either burns through (TIG glove on stick work) or kills your dexterity (stick glove on TIG). Glass Handling and Recycling Glass cutting, glazing and sharps recycling are genuine Cut F territory. HPPE with glass-fibre or stainless-wire wrap, TDM rating F (30+ Newtons). For automotive glass, also look for an impact-rated back to handle dropped panels. This is one of the few categories where over-specification is genuinely warranted — the cost of a Cut F glove is trivial against the cost of a tendon injury. Chemical and Laboratory Work Selection is chemical-specific, not glove-specific. Before issuing chemical-resistant gloves, identify every chemical in the work envelope and cross-reference each against the manufacturer's permeation chart. Nitrile covers most oils, fuels and dilute acids/bases. Neoprene handles a broader range of acids and caustics. Butyl is the specialist for ketones (acetone, MEK) and esters. Viton is the specialist for aromatics (toluene, xylene) and chlorinated solvents. No single glove material covers everything. Multi-chemical environments often need two glove types issued and worn task-by-task. See chemical-resistant gloves. Cold Storage, Freezer Work and Refrigeration EN 511 rating with at least Level 2 contact cold for routine freezer work. For wet-and-cold environments (abattoir wet line, fishing, dairy), Level 1 water penetration is non-negotiable — a glove that wicks moisture chills out within minutes. HPT (hydrophobic) coatings on insulated knit are the current best balance of dexterity and protection. See cold-resistant gloves. Hot Work, Foundry and Furnace Aramid (Kevlar) knit gloves rate Contact Heat Level 2–3 (250–350°C). For foundry and furnace work above 500°C, aluminised gauntlets reflect radiant heat. The standard practice is layered: aramid liner glove for dexterity plus leather or aluminised over-glove for the high-temperature work. Never use synthetic-blend gloves around open flame — many synthetic fibres melt at 200–250°C and adhere to skin. Food Processing, Pharmaceutical and Medical Disposable nitrile (AQL 1.5 or lower for medical, AQL 0.65 for examination grade) handles the cross-contamination control. For food prep with knife exposure, layer a Cut A5+ HPPE glove under a disposable nitrile glove. The HPPE provides cut protection; the nitrile provides food-contact compliance and chemical/protein barrier. See disposable gloves. Automotive Service and Mechanical Work Synthetic leather palm with reinforced fingertips, mesh or spandex back for breathability, TPR knuckle protection on heavier ranges. Cut A2–A3 is normally sufficient for spanner and socket work; step up if cutting/grinding tasks are included. Oil and grease grip from mechanics gloves is the differentiator from a generic rigger glove. Marine and Maritime Wet-and-cold conditions, deck handling, line and netting work. Coated knit with HPT or PVC, Cut B–C, oil/water grip. For commercial fishing, an insulated EN 511 glove with Level 1 water penetration; for deckhand and chandlery work, a coated synthetic with strong abrasion resistance. Agriculture and Horticulture Chemical-resistant gloves for pesticide and fertiliser handling — refer to the SDS to identify which glove material the chemical requires. For general fencing, livestock and machinery work, leather rigger or coated knit at Cut A2–A3. Live Electrical Work (Network and Switchboard) Class 00 to Class 4 rubber insulating gloves under AS/NZS 2161.6 + AS/NZS 2225. Always paired with a leather over-glove. Six-monthly electrical retest required in service. Not interchangeable with general "electrician's gloves" — those are abrasion gloves for general electrical fit-out, not live-work dielectric protection. Coating Types and What They're For Coating Strength Best For Weakness Polyurethane (PU) Dexterity, tactile feedback Electronics, precision assembly, light handling Poor abrasion, low chemical resistance Nitrile (smooth) Oil grip, dry grip, abrasion Mechanical, automotive, dry general industrial Less wet grip than foam Foam nitrile Oil and wet grip, breathability Oil and water mixed environments — mining, construction in wet weather Tears more easily than smooth nitrile Sandy / micro-foam nitrile Maximum wet/oil grip Heavy mining, oil rig, very greasy parts handling Abrasive on bare skin if loose fit Latex (crinkle) Maximum dry grip Concrete, brick, dry timber, drywall Latex allergy risk, poor chemical resistance PVC Water resistance, chemical splash Heavy wet work, dilute acid/base splash Stiff in cold, poor dexterity Hi-grip (HPT) Cold + wet performance Cold storage, deck work, freezer Higher cost Fit, Sizing and Cuff Length Glove fit is the single biggest determinant of whether PPE actually protects the worker. A glove too large will rotate on the hand, exposing fingertips to the hazard. A glove too tight will be removed within an hour and not put back on. Both fail equally. Sizing chart (industry standard) Size EN size Hand circumference (mm) Hand length (mm) XS 6 152 160 S 7 178 171 M 8 203 182 L 9 229 192 XL 10 254 204 XXL 11 279 215 How to measure: wrap a tape measure around the palm at the widest point (just below the knuckles, with the thumb relaxed). The circumference in millimetres maps to the EN size and the manufacturer's size code. Most Australian-stocked gloves run S–XXL; XS and 6.5/7.5/8.5/9.5 half-sizes are available in premium ranges. Cuff length and style Knit wrist: elasticated cuff, standard for general-purpose and coated knit gloves Safety cuff: 5–7cm rigid cuff, easier to don/doff, helps stop swarf and debris entry Gauntlet (15cm+): standard for welding and chemical splash, protects wrist and forearm Extended gauntlet (30cm+ or 45cm): chemical decanting, abattoir, full forearm protection When NOT to Wear Gloves — Rotating Machinery ⚠️ Do not wear loose gloves around rotating machinery. Lathes, drill presses, mills, pillar drills, bench grinders and rotating drive shafts can catch and drag a glove (and the hand inside it) into the cutting zone faster than a worker can react. Australian WHS regulators and machinery operating procedures consistently advise bare hands or close-fitting close-cuff gloves for operating these machines. Gloves are appropriate for setup, workpiece loading, and post-machining cleanup — not for the active cut. See Safe Work Australia guidance on lathe and milling machine operation. This rule applies to: Lathes (manual and CNC during setup with spindle running) Drill presses and pillar drills Milling machines Bench grinders and pedestal grinders Rotating drive shafts, augers and PTOs Lathes for woodturning Hand-held power tools, fixed cutting tools, angle grinders, hand saws and most pneumatic tools are not in this category — gloves are appropriate and required for those. Chemical Glove Donning and Doffing For chemical-handling work, the donning and doffing sequence prevents contamination of the inside of the glove and of the bare hand on removal: Inspect the glove for pinholes, tears or degradation before donning Wash hands and dry thoroughly — moisture inside the glove accelerates dermatitis Don the glove fully — pull over wrist, ensure the cuff covers the sleeve hem (for splash) or sleeve covers the cuff (for vapour) After use, wash the outside of the glove with water while still wearing them — removes residual chemical Doff by peeling the cuff outward over the back of the hand, inverting the glove as you remove it — the contaminated outer surface ends up inside the inverted glove, never touching skin Wash hands immediately after removal Care, Inspection and Replacement Daily inspection Visual check for holes, tears, abrasion wear, stiffness or discolouration Stretch the fabric — a glove that's brittle or cracking has degraded For chemical and electrical gloves: inflate or air-test for pinholes before each use Check the cuff and elastic — a worn cuff lets debris into the glove Replacement triggers Any visible hole, tear or cut through the protective layer Permanent staining from chemical exposure on chemical-resistant gloves (indicates breakthrough — replace immediately) Stiffness, brittleness or yellowing on polymer gloves Coating peeling or delaminating from the knit liner For electrical gloves: any failed inflate-test, any drop, six-monthly retest interval For hi-vis-marked gloves: faded fluorescent fabric End of manufacturer's recommended service life Washing Cotton and knit gloves can generally be laundered cold with mild detergent. Coated gloves (PU, nitrile, latex) should not be laundered — the coating delaminates. Chemical gloves should be washed externally with water before doffing but not machine-laundered. Leather gloves should be wiped down with a damp cloth and dried in shade, never on heat. Always follow the manufacturer's care instructions on the cuff label. Storage Store in a clean, dry area away from direct sunlight, solvents and heat sources. Hang or lay flat — folded storage degrades the dielectric layer on electrical gloves and causes coating cracks on dipped knit gloves. UV exposure ages polymers; a glove kept in a parts bin under shed lighting will outlast one kept on a sunlit dashboard. AIMS' Note on Hand Protection Risk-assess first. The right glove answers a defined hazard. Walk the task, identify the genuine cut, chemical, thermal, electrical and impact loads, then specify the glove. Over-specification is as common as under-specification — and equally problematic when it puts workers off wearing PPE at all. Match the AS/NZS 2161 part to the hazard. Mechanical, chemical, heat, cold and electrical are tested under different parts. A glove rated only for mechanical risk is not a chemical glove regardless of how it feels. Look for the ISO 13997 letter (the Cut A–F letter) on any glove claiming Cut Level 3 or above on Coupe. The TDM letter is the honest number for high-cut work. Cross-reference chemical breakthrough data against the actual chemicals in your work envelope. "Chemical-resistant" alone is meaningless — it has to be resistant to your chemical, at your concentration, for your exposure time. Don't wear loose gloves around rotating machinery. Australian WHS guidance is consistent on this. Fit drives compliance. Issue the right size or the worker won't wear it. Stock S–XXL minimum; offer half-sizes for high-precision work. Replace, don't repair. A patched or stitched glove is no longer rated for anything. Train on use. Donning, doffing, inspection and limits of use are part of the PPE training requirement under AS/NZS 4501. For grinding wheel selection, mounting, RPM matching and the AS 1788.2 safety framework, see our Grinding Wheel Safety Guide — covers cut-off vs grinding wheel use, kickback prevention and PPE selection. Glove Cut Level Cross-Reference — EN 388, ANSI/ISEA 105 & ISO 13997 Two major cut-resistance rating systems apply to Australian glove procurement: EN 388:2016 (European, used on all gloves certified for the Australian market, Cut Levels A–F) and ANSI/ISEA 105 (North American, Cut Levels A1–A9). Both use the same underlying ISO 13997 TDM-100 test — a single straight-blade draw cut measuring the gram-force required to cut through the glove material at 20 mm of blade travel. Because the test method is identical, EN and ANSI cut levels cross-reference directly. The older EN 388 Coupé cut levels (digits 1–5 in the four-digit rating) used a rotating blade that dulled against modern HPPE and aramid yarns, producing unreliable results at higher cut levels. The 2016 revision added the TDM-100 letter (A–F) to fix this — it is the value to use for procurement specification. EN 388 ↔ ANSI/ISEA 105 Cut Level Cross-Reference Cut Resistance (grams force) ISO 13997 Force (Newtons) EN 388:2016 Level ANSI/ISEA 105 Level Typical Application 200–499 g 2–5 N A A1 Light handling, packaging, warehousing, gardening 500–999 g 5–10 N B A2 Light assembly, electronics, general industrial 1,000–1,499 g 10–15 N C A3 Material handling with metal or glass edges, ducting, light construction 1,500–2,199 g 15–22 N D A4 Sheet metal handling, structural steel, light glazing, mining surface 2,200–2,999 g 22–30 N E A5 Glass cutting, metal pressing, heavy steel, food processing knife work 3,000–4,499 g 30–45 N F A6 Heavy glass handling, heavy metal stamping, sharps recycling 4,500–5,999 g 45–60 N F A7 High-risk glass work (automotive, aviation glass), blade sorting ≥ 6,000 g ≥ 60 N F A8–A9 Extreme cut hazard, commercial knife work, materials recovery sort lines Sources: EN 388:2016 Table 1 (ISO 13997 TDM-100 cut levels A–F); ANSI/ISEA 105-2016/2024 Annex A. 1 Newton ≈ 102 grams-force at standard gravity. [VERIFY: ANSI/ISEA 105-2024 — confirm A9 threshold (some editions ≥ 6,000 g, others ≥ 7,500 g); confirm current edition year at ISEA.org.] Why EN 388 Changed in 2016 — Coupé to TDM-100 The original EN 388 Coupé test used a rotating circular blade dragged across the glove material until it cut through. The number of cycles to cut-through was recorded as the cut level (1–5). The problem: high-performance yarns such as HPPE (Dyneema/Spectra) and para-aramid (Kevlar/Twaron) dulled the test blade during the test itself. By the time the blade had completed enough cycles to cut through a genuinely cut-resistant material, it was significantly blunter than it started — producing artificially high cut ratings for the very materials most resistant to cutting in real use. EN 388:2016 added the ISO 13997 TDM-100 (Tomodynamometer) test as the fifth position in the glove marking. TDM-100 uses a single pass of a fresh, sharp straight blade at constant draw speed, measuring the gram-force at which the blade cuts through exactly 20 mm of material travel. A fresh blade every test means the rating reflects actual material performance. You will still see both values on gloves stocked today: the Coupé number in the four-digit position (e.g. the "3" in "4343C") and the TDM letter at the end ("C"). The TDM letter is the value to specify. Where a glove shows only the four-digit Coupé rating with no letter, TDM-100 testing has not been conducted — treat the cut rating with caution for any application above basic light-duty handling. ANSI/ISEA 105 vs EN 388 — Practical Differences for Australian Procurement The two systems share the ISO 13997 TDM-100 test method, so a single physical test generates both ratings. The practical differences are in scale, reporting and certification: Scale width: ANSI uses nine levels (A1–A9); EN 388 uses six (A–F). ANSI subdivides the higher cut range more granularly — EN Level F (≥ 30 N) covers what ANSI divides into A6, A7, A8 and A9. For very high-cut applications such as glass handling or materials recovery, the ANSI scale gives more procurement precision within the top EN level. Units: EN 388 reports ISO 13997 thresholds in Newtons. ANSI/ISEA 105 reports them in grams-force. The conversion: 1 N ≈ 102 g. The cross-reference table above shows both. Market convention: Gloves stocked in Australia carry EN 388 markings (and AS/NZS 2161.2 certification where specifically required). ANSI ratings appear on gloves sourced from North American manufacturers — common in mining, resources and some industrial PPE imports. Many imported gloves are dual-marked to both EN 388 and ANSI/ISEA 105. AS/NZS 2161.2: The Australian mechanical glove protection standard adopts EN 388 test methods directly. Gloves certified to AS/NZS 2161.2 carry EN 388 cut level letters on their markings. [VERIFY: AS/NZS 2161.2 current edition — confirm at Standards Australia catalogue, standards.org.au. Brief referenced AS/NZS 2161.3 — confirmed via article as 2161.2 for mechanical. Do not conflate with 2161.10 (chemical) or 2161.4 (thermal).] Common Cut Level Selection Errors Selecting on price, not hazard. A Cut A glove costs less than a Cut E glove. Choosing the cheaper option for a Cut D application is choosing a hand injury. Run the risk assessment against the actual cutting load — edge sharpness, draw speed, contact pressure — before setting the specification level. Using Cut A–B gloves on glass or sheet metal edges. General warehouse or handling gloves (A1–A2 ANSI, A–B EN) provide minimal protection against a glass pane edge or a steel sheet edge. Sheet metal work typically requires Cut C (EN) / A3 (ANSI) minimum; glass cutting requires Cut E–F (EN) / A5–A6 (ANSI) minimum. Confusing cut resistance with chemical protection. A Cut F HPPE glove does not protect against acid, solvent or oil permeation. Cut resistance (EN 388 / AS/NZS 2161.2) and chemical protection (EN 374 / AS/NZS 2161.10) are separate test methods covering different physical properties. Both must be selected independently where both hazards are present — typically a cut-resistant liner under a chemical outer glove. Specifying the Coupé digit for high-cut applications. Coupé level 5 (the maximum) is not equivalent to Cut Level F (TDM). For any glove used in a genuine high-cut application, verify the TDM letter rating. A glove rated "Coupé 5 / TDM Level B" resists only 5 N of draw cut — unsuitable for glass handling. Assuming ANSI and EN levels are interchangeable without checking. The test method is the same, but ANSI A6 ≈ EN F — not EN E. Use the cross-reference table to confirm equivalence before substituting one standard's rating for another in a procurement specification. AIMS Cut-Resistant Glove Range AIMS Industrial stocks cut-resistant gloves across the full EN 388 A–F range for Australian industry, forming part of our comprehensive hand protection range. Selection spans from lightweight Cut A–B coated knit for general handling through to Cut E–F HPPE and para-aramid liner gloves for glass handling, heavy metal fabrication and recycling applications. Contact the AIMS team if you need help matching a cut level to your specific application — we'll work through the hazard profile with you. People Also Ask — Glove Cut Levels Q: How do ANSI cut levels compare to EN 388? Both systems use the same ISO 13997 TDM-100 test — a straight-blade draw cut measuring gram-force to cut through the glove material at 20 mm travel. EN 388:2016 uses six levels (A–F); ANSI/ISEA 105 uses nine (A1–A9). Approximate equivalents: EN A ≈ ANSI A1, EN B ≈ A2, EN C ≈ A3, EN D ≈ A4, EN E ≈ A5, EN F ≈ A6, with ANSI A7–A9 extending beyond EN F for higher cut forces. Because the test method is the same, a dual-marked glove (EN 388 + ANSI/ISEA 105) can be directly cross-referenced using the gram-force values in the table above. Q: What is ANSI/ISEA 105 and does it apply in Australia? ANSI/ISEA 105 is the North American performance standard for hand and arm protection, covering cut, puncture, abrasion and other mechanical hazards. In Australia, gloves are certified to AS/NZS 2161.2, which adopts EN 388 test methods. Gloves rated to ANSI/ISEA 105 using TDM-100 are directly comparable to EN 388 levels by the cross-reference table, but do not carry AS/NZS 2161.2 certification unless dual-tested. For sites requiring documented AS/NZS compliance, specify AS/NZS 2161.2 and use the EN cut level letter. For general hazard matching, ANSI ratings are directly usable via the cross-reference table. Q: What cut level do I need for sheet metal work? Sheet metal and structural steel handling typically requires EN 388 Cut Level C to D (ANSI A3–A4), corresponding to 10–22 N of cut resistance. Light gauge sheet metal and routine handling: Cut C (EN) / A3 (ANSI). Heavier structural steel and sharp sheet edges with direct contact: Cut D (EN) / A4 (ANSI). Heavy fabrication with frequent close edge contact: Cut E (EN) / A5 (ANSI). Match the specification to the actual edge sharpness and contact load on the specific task, not the material type alone. Q: What is the highest cut level glove available? Under EN 388:2016, the highest level is F, corresponding to ≥ 30 N (≥ 3,000 g) on the ISO 13997 TDM-100 test. Under ANSI/ISEA 105, the highest level is A9, with the threshold depending on the edition — verify the current 2024 revision for the precise gram-force value at A9. At the top end, gloves combine HPPE, para-aramid, glass fibre and stainless-steel wire to achieve A7–A9 / EN F ratings. These are used in glass manufacturing, blade sorting in materials recovery facilities and commercial knife handling. Q: Are cut-resistant gloves the same as slash-resistant gloves? The terms are often used interchangeably, but they describe different cutting mechanics. Cut resistance under EN 388 / ISO 13997 TDM-100 measures resistance to a draw cut — a blade moving along the surface of the glove material. Slash resistance refers to a chopping or sweeping blow, which is a different load profile. EN 388 TDM-100 does not fully represent a slash or chop. For industrial cut hazards (edges, glass, sheet metal), EN 388 is the correct standard. For security or anti-stab applications, separate standards apply and different test methods are used. Q: Can I use ANSI-rated gloves on an Australian work site? Yes, provided the cut level is appropriately matched to the hazard. Australian WHS regulations require PPE to be suitable for the hazard — they do not mandate a specific certification standard for cut-resistant gloves. ANSI/ISEA 105 TDM-100 cut levels are directly comparable to EN 388 levels. If your site safety management system or contract requires AS/NZS 2161.2 certification specifically, the glove must carry that certification. In practice, most gloves available from Australian PPE distributors are certified to EN 388 / AS/NZS 2161.2; ANSI-only marked gloves are less common locally. Q: Why do some gloves show both a number and a letter for cut protection? Because EN 388 now includes two cut tests. The Coupé test result appears as digit 2 in the four-number marking (scale 0–5). The ISO 13997 TDM-100 result appears as a letter (A–F) added after the four digits in EN 388:2016 and later. A glove marked "4343C" has Coupé level 3 and TDM-100 Cut Level C. The number reflects the older, less reliable rotating-blade test; the letter reflects the modern straight-blade test. For any application above basic light-duty handling, the letter is the value to specify. If a glove shows only the four digits with no letter, TDM-100 testing has not been performed. Frequently Asked Questions What is the Australian standard for work gloves? Work gloves in Australia are governed by the AS/NZS 2161 series. AS/NZS 2161.1 sets general requirements; AS/NZS 2161.2 covers mechanical protection (abrasion, cut, tear, puncture); AS/NZS 2161.10 covers chemical and microbiological protection; AS/NZS 2161.4 covers heat and flame; AS/NZS 2161.5 covers cold; and AS/NZS 2161.6 covers electrical insulating gloves. Each part adopts the equivalent European EN test methods, so an EN 388 mechanical rating on a glove label is recognised under AS/NZS 2161.2. What do the four numbers on EN 388 gloves mean? The four digits on an EN 388 / AS/NZS 2161.2 marking are, in order: abrasion resistance (0–4), blade cut resistance Coupe (0–5), tear resistance (0–4) and puncture resistance (0–4). EN 388:2016 added two more values: an ISO 13997 cut level letter (A–F) for more reliable high-cut measurement, and an optional P for impact protection. For example "4543BP" means abrasion 4, Coupe cut 5, tear 4, puncture 3, TDM Cut B, impact-rated. What is the difference between Cut Levels 1–5 and Cut Levels A–F? Cut Levels 1–5 come from the Coupe test (a rotating circular blade). The blade dulls when tested against high-cut materials like HPPE or aramid, so the Coupe rating becomes unreliable above Level 3. Cut Levels A–F come from the ISO 13997 TDM test (a fresh straight blade with constant draw) and remain accurate at high cut levels. EN 388:2016 added the A–F letter alongside the existing 1–5 number. For any glove rated 3 or higher on Coupe, the A–F letter is the value you should select against. What cut level do I need for working with glass? Glass handling typically requires Cut Level F under ISO 13997 (30+ Newtons of cut resistance). This is the level for automotive glass, aviation glass, glass manufacturing and sharps recycling. For window-glass installation in residential work, Cut Level E (22 N) is often sufficient. For decorative glass and lighter glazing, Cut Level D (15 N) covers most exposures. The general rule: use the manufacturer's permeation/cut chart against the specific glass weight and edge profile rather than assuming all glass work is the same. Are EN 388 cut-resistant gloves cut-proof? No. No glove is cut-proof. EN 388 / ISO 13997 gloves are cut-resistant to a tested level. Cut Level F resists a 30 N draw cut at 20mm — beyond that force, the material will cut through. A direct deliberate stab with a sharp blade will penetrate any cut-resistant glove. Cut-resistant gloves are designed to prevent accidental contact injuries, not deliberate puncture, and not full-force stab. Treat them as substantial protection within their rating, not as armour. What glove do I need for handling acetone or methyl ethyl ketone (MEK)? Butyl rubber gloves are the standard for ketones (acetone, MEK), esters and aldehydes. Nitrile, latex, neoprene and PVC all permeate ketones relatively quickly and are not appropriate for extended handling. For brief splash exposure (under 10 minutes), nitrile may be acceptable; for any extended handling, butyl. Always cross-reference the specific chemical and concentration against the glove manufacturer's permeation chart before specifying. What's the difference between Type A, B and C chemical gloves under EN 374? EN 374-1:2016 grades chemical gloves by how many chemicals from the test panel of 18 they resist at Level 2 (30 minutes breakthrough) or better. Type A resists at least 6 chemicals; Type B resists at least 3; Type C resists at least 1 at Level 1 (10 minutes — splash only). The letter codes on the label (A, B, C, etc.) identify which specific chemicals were tested. A Type A glove tested against your specific chemical is the goal; a Type C glove offers light splash protection only. Can I wear gloves while using a lathe or drill press? Australian WHS guidance advises against wearing loose gloves around rotating machinery including lathes, drill presses, mills, bench grinders and rotating drive shafts. The risk is the glove being caught and pulling the hand into the cutting zone. Gloves are appropriate for setup, workpiece loading and post-machining cleanup, but not during the active cut on these machines. Close-fitting close-cuff gloves are sometimes accepted for specific operations — refer to your site's safe work method statement. Do disposable nitrile gloves provide any cut protection? No. Disposable nitrile gloves are designed for cross-contamination control and light chemical splash protection. They do not provide meaningful cut, abrasion or puncture resistance. For food prep, butchery and similar tasks where both cut protection and food-contact compliance are required, layer a Cut A5+ HPPE glove underneath a disposable nitrile glove. The HPPE provides cut resistance; the nitrile provides the food-grade barrier. How often should electrical insulating gloves be retested? Under AS/NZS 2225 and most Australian network operator standards, Class 0 and above rubber insulating gloves must be electrically retested every 6 months while in service. Gloves are also visually inspected and air-tested (inflated to check for pinholes) before every use. Class 00 gloves typically require annual retesting. After any drop, abrasion incident, solvent exposure or suspected damage, gloves are removed from service and sent for retest before reuse. Are leather gloves cut-resistant? Leather provides moderate cut resistance — typically Cut Level B to D under ISO 13997 depending on thickness, tanning and source (cowhide, goatskin, deerskin). Leather is excellent for abrasion and is the standard for rigger, welder and general construction work. For genuine high-cut hazards (Cut E–F), purpose-engineered HPPE or aramid materials with steel or glass-fibre wrap significantly outperform leather at lower bulk and better dexterity. What's the right glove for cold storage and freezer work? EN 511 / AS/NZS 2161.5-rated gloves with at least Level 2 contact cold and Level 1 water penetration. For dry freezer work, insulated knit gloves with HPT (hydrophobic) coating give a good balance of dexterity and warmth. For wet-and-cold environments (abattoir wet line, fishing, dairy), water penetration Level 1 is non-negotiable — a glove that wicks moisture loses insulation within minutes. Standard general-purpose gloves are not rated for cold and provide no thermal insulation. How long do work gloves last? Service life varies enormously with the application. General-purpose coated knit gloves typically last 1–4 weeks of daily use before the coating wears through. Leather riggers last 2–8 weeks depending on the task. HPPE cut-resistant gloves often last 4–12 weeks. Disposable nitrile is single-shift or single-task. Chemical gloves should be replaced immediately on contamination or any visible degradation. Electrical gloves are retested every 6 months and replaced on failure. The cost of replacement gloves is always lower than the cost of a hand injury — set replacement triggers in your PPE policy and follow them. Are work gloves marked CE the same as AS/NZS-compliant? CE marking indicates compliance with European PPE Regulation 2016/425 and the underlying EN standards (EN 388, EN 374, EN 407 etc.). The AS/NZS 2161 series adopts those same EN test methods, so a glove tested to EN 388 is functionally equivalent to AS/NZS 2161.2. For Australian workplace use, look for either the AS/NZS 2161 marking directly or the EN standard marking with confirmation that the equivalent AS/NZS part is satisfied. Many gloves stocked in Australia are dual-marked. What's the most common reason work gloves fail to protect? Poor fit. A glove too large rotates on the hand and exposes fingertips; a glove too small is removed within an hour and not put back on. Both fail equally. The second most common reason is mismatch — the right glove for the wrong hazard (cut glove for chemical work, chemical glove for cut hazard). The third is delayed replacement — gloves used past their service life. All three are solved by a basic PPE policy: size on issue, hazard-specific selection, defined replacement triggers. Shop Hand Protection at AIMS AIMS Industrial stocks a comprehensive range of hand protection rated to the AS/NZS 2161 series and EN 388 / EN 374 / EN 407 / EN 511 standards — including Frontier, Beaver, Ninja, Contego and other major Australian-supplied brands. Whether you need general-purpose coated knit for warehousing, Cut F HPPE for glass handling, butyl chemical gloves for solvent decanting, or insulated wet-and-cold gloves for cold-store work, the range covers the full Australian industry need. Companion guides for the rest of your PPE kit: Safety Glasses Guide — AS/NZS 1337.1-compliant eye protection Steel Cap Boots Guide — AS/NZS 2210.3 footwear Hi-Vis Vest Guide — AS/NZS 4602.1 high-visibility Respirator Guide — AS/NZS 1716 respiratory protection Welding Helmet Guide — AS/NZS 1338.1 welding Hard Hat Guide — AS/NZS 1801 head protection Work Glove Types: A Complete Guide — companion category-by-category guide For acid, caustic, and solvent transfer, see the AIMS chemical pump range.
Read more
